Low cost structures; the case for & against!

Working alongside KKP, Edge Architects is often asked to investigate the viability of low cost sports and recreation structures. The short-term, or temporary, building type falls into four main categories each with their own strengths and weaknesses.

Inflatable structures are often quick to erect, no foundations are needed, offer some insulation, provide easy large spans and let light in. However they are difficult shapes to work with, sometimes look out of place and can appear too insubstantial especially in high winds. Although some have been up for considerable periods of time, they are, perhaps, best viewed as a temporary solution rather than a permanent answer.

Aluminium frame PVC fabric structures: these are, again, quick to erect and need little foundation work, they can have translucent coverings allowing light in and can be made quite secure. On the down side they take longer to construct, and can cost slightly more, than a simple inflatable structure especially on longer spans. They are however more suitable for ‘longer short-term' installations - perhaps 3-5 years.

Both inflatable and PVC structures tend to ‘sweat' which can, for example, lead to condensation on courts. They also have a tendency to be over-hot in summer and expensive to heat during winter months.

Steel truss frame structures can offer huge spans over 60m and are more substantial again than the first two. They come into their own for larger buildings being relatively quick to erect and offering semi permanent levels of security. More substantial foundations and higher costs particularly for smaller buildings make this a solution best suited to larger sports halls.

Modular buildings or "Portacabin" type installations are the most substantial solution, offering building regulations compliant levels of insulation and a truly solid structure. However large spans and very high eaves are generally not achievable with this type of construction.

***

All these can provide temporary low cost, out of season solutions for, amongst others; tennis, swimming, gymnasiums, basketball, netball and riding. The option to hire, lease or lease purchase can also be very attractive when considered in tandem with the absolute fixed cost offered by this market sector and can be a very viable solution.

As in all cases, it is vital to consider exactly what it is you are looking to provide to what level of quality and for what audience(s). You must also consider ongoing manufacture and running costs. A little more thought and planning upfront may reap more reward in the end. A "quick win" may not always be quick and may certainly end up costing more in the long run. If you do consider these types of "solutions", it is essential to balance cost with longevity and factor in issues such as security and the quality of user experience. What goes up tomorrow may last for 5 years, but a building that takes a little longer to construct and costs a bit more may be more likely to stand the test of time.

To contact Justin direct or find out more what they do - visit Edge's website 

 

 


© 2012  Knight, Kavanagh & Page, 1-2 Frecheville Court, off Knowsley Street, Bury, BL9 0UF.  Tel: 0161 764 7040

Sitemap  |  Terms & conditions  |  Accessibility  |  Webmail  |  Access: Digital Marketing